campaign for adventure
campaign for adventure
campaign for adventure
 
Main Menu
Home
Introduction
- - - - - - -
Campaign Agenda
Aims and Objectives
Core Principles
- - - - - - -
Supporters and Patrons
Who is Doing What
Events and Conferences
Press Pages
- - - - - - -
Newsletter
Quotes and Extracts
Examples from the Campaign
- - - - - - -
Actions and Help
Contact Us
Member Login
- - - - - - -
CfA Forum
Press Pages
cfa
Latest News
campaign for adventure

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid CSS!

Risk is OK - Courts decide PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 08 April 2008

Risk is OK - Courts decide

The benefit of healthy risk-taking outweigh the risks 

 Beales -v- The Scouts

In the recent case of Beales -v- The Scouts Assc the court was asked to
consider whether the Assc. were negligent in running a game which
involved the children jumping over a rope with a bag tied to the end.

The game was called "Break a leg" or "last man standing" and tested the
children's dexterity amongst other things. The claimant broke their
wrist when they fell awkwardly after being hit by the rope. The claimant
argued the game was dangerous and without mats or a proper risk
assessment should not have been played.
The court in rejecting those submissions held that the game had been
played for many years,  the leaders were well qualified and experienced
in arranging  the game  and that overall and having a mind to the
compensation bill ( although not directly applicable because the
accident pre dated the bill) the game did involve some risk but it was
not in the interests of any child to sit at home and avoid risk. By
taking part in activities with risks, they are learning how to deal with
risk and danger in later life and of course risk often equates to fun
which should be in every child's life.
 
The Judge concluded the Scouts had acted reasonably by balancing
elements of risk with healthy activity and therefore the claim was
dismissed.
 
< Prev   Next >
Website Design and SEO by SO Web Designs Ltd(c) 2005